Biomedical Scientists' Perceptions of Ethical and Social Implications: Is There a Role for Research Ethics Consultation?
2009

Biomedical Scientists' Views on Research Ethics Consultation

Sample size: 901 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Jennifer B. McCormick, Angie M. Boyce, Mildred K. Cho

Primary Institution: Stanford University

Hypothesis

Do biomedical science researchers perceive a need for and utility of research ethics consultation?

Conclusion

Biomedical researchers recognize ethical and societal questions in their work and many would likely use a consultation service if aware of it.

Supporting Evidence

  • 51% of researchers found a research ethics consultation service at their institution useful.
  • 36% reported that such a service would be personally useful.
  • Researchers conducting human subjects research were more likely to find the service useful.

Takeaway

Scientists often think about ethical questions in their research, and many would find it helpful to talk to someone about these issues.

Methodology

The study involved telephone interviews, focus groups, and a mailed survey to researchers at seven universities.

Potential Biases

Participants may have perceived ethical implications negatively due to the phrasing of questions.

Limitations

The study relied on publicly available websites for participant selection, which may have contributed to a non-contact rate.

Participant Demographics

Participants included faculty, postdoctoral fellows, graduate students, and research staff from various biomedical departments.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Statistical Significance

p<0.001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0004659

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication