Switching from premixed insulin to glargine-based insulin regimen improves glycaemic control in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes: a retrospective primary care-based analysis
2009

Switching from premixed insulin to glargine improves diabetes control

Sample size: 528 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Peter Sharplin, Jason Gordon, John R Peters, Anthony P Tetlow, Andrea J Longman, Philip McEwan

Primary Institution: CHKS Health Economics Unit, Health Park, Cardiff, UK

Hypothesis

Does switching from premixed insulin to a glargine-based regimen improve glycaemic control in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes?

Conclusion

Switching to a glargine-based insulin regimen significantly improves glycaemic control in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by premixed insulins.

Supporting Evidence

  • Patients with type 1 diabetes saw a mean HbA1c reduction of -0.67%.
  • Patients with type 2 diabetes experienced a mean HbA1c reduction of -0.53%.
  • The greatest HbA1c improvement was in patients with a baseline HbA1c ≥ 10%.
  • The proportion of patients using bolus insulin increased significantly after switching.
  • Total daily insulin use increased in type 2 diabetes patients after the switch.

Takeaway

If you have diabetes and your current insulin isn't working well, switching to a different type called glargine can help you control your blood sugar better.

Methodology

Retrospective observational analysis using data from a UK GP database, evaluating changes in HbA1c after switching from premixed to glargine insulin.

Potential Biases

The decision to switch insulin was based on clinical judgment, which may introduce bias.

Limitations

The study is retrospective and may not account for all confounding factors; hypoglycaemic episodes were inconsistently reported.

Participant Demographics

528 patients (183 with type 1 diabetes and 345 with type 2 diabetes), mean age 22.9 years for type 1 and 55.8 years for type 2.

Statistical Information

P-Value

<0.001

Statistical Significance

p < 0.001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1475-2840-8-9

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication