Comparing Methods for Measuring MicroRNAs
Author Information
Author(s): Ach Robert A, Wang Hui, Curry Bo
Primary Institution: Agilent Laboratories, Agilent Technologies
Hypothesis
How well do microarray and quantitative PCR measurements of microRNAs correlate, and how does total RNA preparation affect these measurements?
Conclusion
Microarray and qPCR results for most miRNAs correlate well, but some miRNAs show significant differences depending on the measurement method and RNA preparation technique.
Supporting Evidence
- Most expressed miRNAs correlated well between microarray and qPCR methods.
- Some miRNAs showed significant differences in expression levels depending on the RNA preparation method.
- Using spiked-in synthetic miRNAs, the study confirmed that differences in measurements were not due to sensitivity issues.
Takeaway
This study looked at how well two different methods for measuring tiny RNA molecules called microRNAs agree with each other and found that while they usually do, some methods can give different results.
Methodology
The study compared the expression of 61 miRNAs across nine human tissues using both Agilent microarrays and TaqMan qPCR, and evaluated three different total RNA preparation methods.
Potential Biases
Potential biases may arise from the RNA preparation methods affecting miRNA quantification.
Limitations
The study focused on a limited number of miRNAs and tissues, which may not represent all possible variations.
Participant Demographics
Human tissues from nine different sources were used.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p<0.05
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website