Breast cancer risk in elderly women with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases: a population-based case–control study
2009

Breast cancer risk in elderly women with autoimmune diseases

Sample size: 84778 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Gadalla S M, Amr S, Langenberg P, Baumgarten M, Davidson W F, Schairer C, Engels E A, Pfeiffer R M, Goedert J J

Primary Institution: Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute

Hypothesis

Are systemic rheumatic diseases associated with breast cancer risk in elderly women?

Conclusion

The study found that rheumatoid arthritis is associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer, while systemic lupus erythematosus may reduce the risk of ER-negative breast cancer.

Supporting Evidence

  • Women with rheumatoid arthritis had a lower risk of developing breast cancer.
  • Systemic lupus erythematosus was associated with a reduced risk of ER-negative breast cancer.
  • The study included a large sample size of 84,778 breast cancer cases and controls.
  • Data was sourced from the SEER-Medicare database, ensuring a population-based approach.
  • Findings suggest systemic inflammation may influence breast cancer risk.

Takeaway

Older women with rheumatoid arthritis are less likely to get breast cancer, and those with lupus might have a lower chance of getting a specific type of breast cancer.

Methodology

The study used a population-based case-control design, comparing breast cancer cases with age-matched cancer-free controls using data from the SEER-Medicare database.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to missing information on ER expression and underestimation of immunosuppressive medication use.

Limitations

The study lacked information on important breast cancer risk factors such as obesity and parity, and detailed medical information about the SARD conditions.

Participant Demographics

Participants were women aged 67-99 years, with a majority being white.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.02

Confidence Interval

95% CI=0.82–0.93 for RA

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1038/sj.bjc.6604906

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication