Potential Exposure to Australian Bat Lyssavirus, Queensland, 1996-1999
Author Information
Author(s): Bradley J. McCall, Jonathan H. Epstein, Annette S. Neill, Karen Heel, Hume Field, Janine Barrett, Greg A. Smith, Linda A. Selvey, Barry Rodwell, Ross Lunt
Primary Institution: Brisbane Southside Public Health Unit
Hypothesis
What is the pattern of potential human exposure to Australian bat lyssavirus (ABL) in Queensland from 1996 to 1999?
Conclusion
The study found that potential exposures to ABL were most common among volunteer bat handlers and that public awareness increased significantly after the first reported human cases.
Supporting Evidence
- Two human deaths from ABL infection were reported since 1996.
- Volunteer animal handlers accounted for 39% of potential exposures.
- 6% of sick, injured, or orphaned bats tested positive for ABL.
Takeaway
Some people in Queensland got sick from a virus found in bats, and many of them were people who handled bats. It's important to be careful around bats.
Methodology
The study involved collecting data from individuals who reported potential ABL exposure and testing bats for ABL infection.
Potential Biases
There may be bias in reporting due to the reluctance of bat handlers to surrender bats for testing.
Limitations
The study relied on self-reported data, which may lead to underreporting of exposures.
Participant Demographics
The majority of participants were adults, with a higher proportion of females among volunteer bat handlers.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p<0.001
Statistical Significance
p<0.001
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website