Caloric Restriction vs Time-Restricted Eating in Older Adults
Author Information
Author(s): Houston Denise, Nicklas Barbara, Miller Michael, Fanning Jason, Hsu Fang-Chi, DeLany James, Ard Jamy, Kritchevsky Stephen
Primary Institution: Wake Forest University School of Medicine
Hypothesis
The study aims to evaluate the long-term effects of caloric restriction and time-restricted eating on lifespan and healthspan in older adults.
Conclusion
The pilot study found that both caloric restriction and time-restricted eating are feasible and acceptable interventions for older adults.
Supporting Evidence
- Retention in the study is 89%.
- Intervention session attendance is 84%.
- 90% of CR participants weighed in on 90% of days.
- 65% of CR participants maintained their weight within the adherence zone >75% of the time.
- 77% of TRE participants reported eating within an 8.5-hour window.
Takeaway
This study is looking at two different eating plans to see if they can help older people live healthier and longer lives.
Methodology
The study randomized 90 older adults with obesity or overweight and at least one comorbidity to three different 9-month interventions.
Limitations
The long-term benefits of these diets on lifespan and healthspan in humans are still unknown.
Participant Demographics
Older adults (≥ 60 years) with obesity or overweight and at least one comorbidity.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website