Postnatal quality of life in women after normal vaginal delivery and caesarean section
2009

Postnatal Quality of Life After Delivery

Sample size: 100 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Torkan Behnaz, Parsay Sousan, Lamyian Minoor, Kazemnejad Anoshirvan, Montazeri Ali

Primary Institution: Khorasgan Azad University

Hypothesis

Does the mode of delivery (normal vaginal delivery vs. caesarean section) affect the postnatal quality of life in women?

Conclusion

Normal vaginal delivery may lead to a better quality of life, particularly in terms of physical health, compared to caesarean section.

Supporting Evidence

  • Women after vaginal delivery scored higher on mental health and vitality compared to those after caesarean section.
  • The normal delivery group showed significant improvements in physical health-related quality of life.
  • The study suggests that normal vaginal delivery may be preferable in the absence of medical indications.

Takeaway

This study looked at how women felt after giving birth, and it found that those who had normal deliveries felt better than those who had caesarean sections.

Methodology

A prospective study comparing quality of life in women after normal delivery and caesarean section using the SF-36 questionnaire.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to self-reported measures and the non-randomized nature of the sample.

Limitations

The study had a small sample size and was conducted in a specific cultural context, which may limit generalizability.

Participant Demographics

Women aged 20 to 40, with one or two children, from Isfahan, Iran.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.03

Confidence Interval

95% CI for the difference

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2393-9-4

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication