Prescribing patterns in dementia: a multicentre observational study in a German network of CAM physicians
2011

Prescribing Patterns in Dementia Treatment by CAM Physicians

Sample size: 577 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Jeschke Elke, Ostermann Thomas, Vollmar Horst C, Tabali Manuela, Schad Friedemann, Matthes Harald

Primary Institution: Havelhoehe Research Institute

Hypothesis

This study aims to investigate dementia treatment strategies among physicians specialised in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) by analysing prescribing patterns and comparing them to current treatment guidelines in Germany.

Conclusion

The prescribing frequency for anti-dementia drugs is equivalent to those found in other German studies, while the administration of Ginkgo biloba is significantly higher.

Supporting Evidence

  • 25.6% of patients with dementia were prescribed anti-dementia drugs.
  • Ginkgo biloba was the most frequently prescribed anti-dementia drug overall (67.6%).
  • Patients with Alzheimer's disease had a higher likelihood of receiving anti-dementia drugs.
  • Neurologists were more likely to prescribe anti-dementia drugs compared to general practitioners.
  • Co-morbidities such as hypertension and heart failure increased the odds of receiving anti-dementia drugs.

Takeaway

Doctors who use alternative medicine often prescribe Ginkgo biloba for dementia, even though it's not recommended in official guidelines.

Methodology

A multicentre observational study involving 22 primary care physicians who reported prescriptions and diagnoses for patients with dementia over a 5-year period.

Potential Biases

Potential misclassification bias due to lack of objective evaluations and small sample size of participating CAM physicians.

Limitations

The study lacks objective tests for dementia, which increases the possibility of misclassification bias regarding dementia type and severity.

Participant Demographics

Median age of patients was 81 years, with 69% being female.

Statistical Information

Confidence Interval

CI: 1.59-3.47

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2377-11-99

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication