Does Open Access Improve the Process and Outcome of Podiatric Care?
2011

Does Open Access Improve Podiatric Care?

Sample size: 24 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Wrobel James S., Davies Michael L., Robbins Jeffrey M.

Primary Institution: Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center

Hypothesis

Open access clinics would result in decreased wait times, increased number of podiatry visits, fewer 'no shows', higher rates of acute care visits, and lower minor amputation rates over control clinics without open access.

Conclusion

Open access clinics had more timely access for new patients and lower rates of minor amputations.

Supporting Evidence

  • Open access clinics had 96% of new consults seen within 30 days compared to 89% in control clinics.
  • Minor amputation rates were lower in open access clinics at 0.62 per 1,000 compared to 1.0 per 1,000 in control clinics.

Takeaway

Open access clinics let patients see doctors faster and help reduce the number of foot amputations.

Methodology

This study was a national retrospective case-control study of VHA podiatry clinics in 2008 comparing eight open access facilities to sixteen control facilities.

Potential Biases

Open access facilities may represent centers with better coordination of care, which could skew results.

Limitations

Selection bias could have been present due to the low response rate and the retrospective nature of the study.

Participant Demographics

Participants were from VHA podiatry clinics across the United States.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.050

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.4021/jocmr545w

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication