Cost-benefit parameters in evaluating automation
1983

Evaluating the Cost-Benefit of Automation in Laboratories

Sample size: 3 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Thomas M. Craig

Primary Institution: Clinical & Instrument Systems Division, E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, Inc.

Hypothesis

Automation in clinical laboratories can reduce costs and improve efficiency.

Conclusion

Automation can lower the cost per patient test and improve laboratory efficiency, benefiting the overall hospital system.

Supporting Evidence

  • Automation reduced the total cost per reportable test in all three hospitals studied.
  • Quality control and the number of tests repeated were reduced to a third of their former level with automation.
  • Laboratory productivity increased significantly, allowing for more tests to be processed with the same staff.

Takeaway

Using machines in labs can save money and help doctors get test results faster, which means patients can go home sooner.

Methodology

The study evaluated cost savings and efficiency improvements in three small hospitals before and after implementing automation.

Limitations

The study is based on a limited number of small hospitals, which may not represent larger institutions.

Participant Demographics

Three small hospitals in the US.

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication