Reply to Drs. Capucci, Lavazza, and Mead
1998

Reply to Drs. Capucci, Lavazza, and Mead

publication Evidence: low

Author Information

Author(s): Smith Alvin W., Cherry Neil J., Matson David O.

Hypothesis

Is RHD multifactorial requiring two or more agents?

Conclusion

The study suggests that the risk of human infection with RHD remains largely unaddressed and requires further investigation.

Supporting Evidence

  • The virus' infectivity and pathogenesis are poorly characterized.
  • Public health protection requires prudent avoidance of pathogens.
  • Mead et al. concluded no significant association between exposure to RCV and illness.

Takeaway

The authors are saying that we need to be careful about a disease that can kill rabbits and might affect humans, even if we don't have proof yet.

Methodology

The authors derived their findings from data obtained under a freedom of information request.

Potential Biases

Opposing conclusions from different studies raise concerns about the quality of the research.

Limitations

The study's conclusions are based on limited data and may not represent the full picture of RHD's impact on human health.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3201/eid0402.980238

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication