Effectiveness of Core Stability Exercises and Recovery Myofascial Release Massage on Fatigue in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
2012

Core Stability Exercises and Massage for Breast Cancer Survivors

Sample size: 78 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Irene Cantarero-Villanueva, Carolina Fernández-Lao, Rosario del Moral-Avila, César Fernández-de-las-Peñas, María Belén Feriche-Fernández-Castanys, Manuel Arroyo-Morales

Primary Institution: University of Granada

Hypothesis

Does an 8-week multimodal program of core stability exercises and recovery massage improve physical and psychological outcomes in breast cancer survivors?

Conclusion

The study found that the multimodal program significantly reduced fatigue and improved mood and muscle strength in breast cancer survivors.

Supporting Evidence

  • The multimodal program led to significant improvements in fatigue and mood state.
  • Participants in the experimental group showed greater improvements in muscle strength compared to the control group.
  • Effects on fatigue were maintained at 6 months post-intervention.
  • Significant group × time interactions were found for multiple outcomes measured by the POMS questionnaire.
  • Participants completed a high percentage of the physical therapy sessions.

Takeaway

This study shows that doing special exercises and getting massages can help breast cancer survivors feel less tired and stronger.

Methodology

A randomized controlled trial with 78 breast cancer survivors assigned to either an experimental group receiving core stability exercises and massage or a control group receiving usual care.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to the control group being able to increase physical activity during the study.

Limitations

The control group was allowed to increase physical activity freely, which may introduce bias.

Participant Demographics

Breast cancer survivors aged 25-65, diagnosed with stage I–IIIA breast cancer.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.015

Confidence Interval

95% CI 0.14–0.81

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1155/2012/620619

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication