Hematological Changes as Prognostic Indicators of Survival: Similarities Between Gottingen Minipigs, Humans, and Other Large Animal Models Acute Radiation Syndrome in the Gottingen Minipig
2011

Hematological Changes in Gottingen Minipigs After Radiation Exposure

Sample size: 30 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Moroni Maria, Lombardini Eric, Salber Rudolph, Kazemzedeh Mehdi, Nagy Vitaly, Olsen Cara, Whitnall Mark H.

Primary Institution: Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences

Hypothesis

Is the Gottingen minipig a suitable model for studying acute radiation syndrome compared to humans and other large animals?

Conclusion

The Gottingen minipig exhibits hematological changes similar to those seen in humans and other large animals after radiation exposure, making it a suitable model for studying acute radiation syndrome.

Supporting Evidence

  • The LD50/30 for the Gottingen minipig was established at 1.73 Gy.
  • Hematological changes in the minipig were similar to those observed in humans after radiation exposure.
  • Platelet counts and neutrophil responses were significantly correlated with survival outcomes.

Takeaway

Scientists studied how Gottingen minipigs react to radiation, and found that their blood changes are a lot like what happens in humans, which means they can help test new treatments for radiation sickness.

Methodology

30 male Gottingen minipigs were irradiated with various doses, and blood samples were taken to monitor hematological changes over time.

Potential Biases

Potential bias in the selection of animal models and the interpretation of results based on existing literature.

Limitations

The study primarily focused on hematological changes and did not explore other potential effects of radiation exposure.

Participant Demographics

30 male Gottingen minipigs, aged 4-5 months, weighing 9-11 kg.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0025210

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication