Significant differences when using creatinine, modification of diet in renal disease, or cystatin C for estimating glomerular filtration rate in ICU patients
2011

Discussion on GFR Markers in ICU Patients

Commentary

Author Information

Author(s): Anders Larsson

Primary Institution: Uppsala University

Hypothesis

The study questions the reliability of creatinine and cystatin C as GFR markers in ICU patients.

Conclusion

The differences between creatinine and cystatin C estimates of GFR are significant, and further studies are needed to compare these with exogenous GFR markers.

Supporting Evidence

  • Both creatinine and cystatin C are widely used to estimate kidney function in ICU patients.
  • Inflammation may affect cystatin C levels, but it is unclear how this impacts GFR estimation.
  • The authors found no studies comparing creatinine or cystatin C with exogenous GFR markers in ICU patients.

Takeaway

Doctors are trying to figure out the best way to measure kidney function in very sick patients, but the tests they use might not be very accurate.

Limitations

The commentary acknowledges the lack of studies comparing endogenous and exogenous GFR markers in ICU patients.

Participant Demographics

ICU patients with acute kidney injury.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3109/03009734.2011.578763

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication