Predicting infectious disease risks
2011

Predicting Infectious Disease Risks

publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Mark Woolhouse

Primary Institution: Centre for Infectious Diseases, University of Edinburgh

Hypothesis

How can we make accurate predictions about future infectious disease risks?

Conclusion

Formal, quantitative methods can improve predictions about infectious disease outbreaks and their control.

Supporting Evidence

  • Quantitative modeling has been successful in predicting outbreaks of diseases like AIDS and influenza.
  • The review emphasizes the need for better communication of predictive model results to policymakers.
  • Emerging infectious diseases are linked to various drivers, including climate change and human demographics.

Takeaway

Scientists use math to guess when and how diseases might spread, so we can stop them before they get too bad.

Methodology

The review discusses various quantitative modeling approaches, including risk factor analysis and dynamic modeling.

Potential Biases

There may be biases in data collection and reporting, affecting the accuracy of predictions.

Limitations

The predictive models may not account for all variables affecting disease spread, and communication of results to policymakers can be improved.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1098/rstb.2010.0387

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication