Changes in Cytokine Levels and NK Cell Activation Associated with Influenza Innate Immune Responses to Influenza
2011

Changes in NK Cell Activation and Cytokine Levels During Influenza Infection

Sample size: 30 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Jost Stephanie, Quillay Heloise, Reardon Jeff, Peterson Eric, Simmons Rachel P., Parry Blair A., Bryant Nancy N. P., Binder William D., Altfeld Marcus

Primary Institution: Ragon Institute of Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard

Hypothesis

How do NK cell responses and cytokine levels change during acute influenza infection and vaccination?

Conclusion

The study found that acute influenza infection leads to decreased NK cell numbers and altered cytokine levels, while vaccination increases NK cell activation.

Supporting Evidence

  • Influenza infection was associated with a decrease in peripheral blood NK cells.
  • Vaccination led to an increase in CD25+ NK cells.
  • Acute influenza infection resulted in low levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines.
  • CD56bright NK cells were particularly affected by influenza infection.
  • Influenza vaccination increased NK cell activation markers.
  • Patients with pandemic H1N1 showed different NK cell responses compared to seasonal influenza.

Takeaway

When people get the flu, some special immune cells called NK cells decrease in number, but when they get vaccinated, those cells increase and become more active.

Methodology

The study analyzed blood samples from individuals with acute influenza and those vaccinated against influenza, measuring NK cell numbers and cytokine levels.

Potential Biases

Potential biases may arise from the selection of study subjects and the timing of sample collection.

Limitations

The study was limited to a specific population and may not generalize to all individuals.

Participant Demographics

30 individuals with acute influenza symptoms, median age 32 years, 14 women and 16 men.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p=0.0005

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0025060

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication