Using Reflexivity to Improve Interviewing Skills for Clinician Researchers
Author Information
Author(s): Ruth McNair, Angela Taft, Kelsey Hegarty
Primary Institution: The Department of General Practice, University of Melbourne
Hypothesis
Can reflexivity enhance the in-depth interviewing skills of clinician researchers?
Conclusion
Novice clinician researchers should recognize their multiple identities and seek guidance to improve their interviewing skills.
Supporting Evidence
- Reflexivity improved the rigor of data collection.
- Reciprocity between interviewer and interviewee enhanced engagement and trust.
- Pilot interviews with feedback helped identify areas for improvement.
Takeaway
This study shows that doctors can be better interviewers by thinking about their own experiences and feelings during interviews.
Methodology
The study involved in-depth interviews with 60 participants, focusing on the patient-doctor relationship.
Potential Biases
Potential for insider bias and coercion due to the clinician's dual role.
Limitations
The study lacks formal guidelines for clinician researchers and relies on personal experiences.
Participant Demographics
Participants included same-sex attracted women and their general practitioners.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website