Predictors of web-based follow-up response in the Prevention of Low Back Pain in the Military Trial
2011

Predictors of web-based follow-up response in the Prevention of Low Back Pain in the Military Trial

Sample size: 4325 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Childs John D, Teyhen Deydre S, Van Wyngaarden Joshua J, Dougherty Brett F, Ladislas Bryan J, Helton Gary L, Robinson Michael E, Wu Samuel S, George Steven Z

Primary Institution: US Army-Baylor University Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy

Hypothesis

Subjects receiving increased attention via a randomly selected education program or physical examination session would have higher follow-up rates than those receiving less attention.

Conclusion

The overall web-based response rate during the first year of the POLM trial was lower than expected for standard clinical trials, and was significantly associated with demographic characteristics, health status, and individualized attention.

Supporting Evidence

  • Responders were more likely to be older, Caucasian, and have higher education and income.
  • Response rates were significantly associated with individualized attention from physical examinations.
  • Smoking status was a significant predictor of response rates.

Takeaway

This study looked at why some soldiers responded to online surveys about back pain while others didn't, finding that older soldiers and those who got more personal attention were more likely to respond.

Methodology

Soldiers were cluster randomized into different exercise programs and followed up with web-based surveys to assess response rates.

Potential Biases

Potential attrition bias due to low follow-up rates and the homogeneity of the sample.

Limitations

The study's findings may not be generalizable due to the homogeneity of the military population and potential biases in self-reported data.

Participant Demographics

71% male, 72% White/Caucasian, mean age 22.0 years.

Statistical Information

P-Value

<0.05

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2474-12-132

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication