Urological Oncology - Dilemmas and Developments
1993
Review of Urological Oncology Book
Editorial
Evidence: low
Author Information
Author(s): P.1. Clark
Conclusion
The book provides an outdated view of urological cancer management and lacks important discussions on recent advancements.
Supporting Evidence
- The book reflects a mid-1980s view of urological cancer.
- It lacks discussions on molecular advancements and screening potential.
- The chapters on bladder cancer are better but still lack debate on treatment options.
- The prostate section only discusses advanced disease, omitting early treatment options.
- Testicular cancer is covered better, but still has notable omissions.
Takeaway
This book talks about old ways to treat bladder and prostate cancer, but it misses a lot of new ideas and treatments that are important today.
Limitations
The book is based on a conference from 1988 and does not include recent advancements in urological cancer treatment.
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website