Media Reporting of Health Interventions: Signs of Improvement, but Major Problems Persist
Author Information
Author(s): Amanda Wilson, Billie Bonevski, Alison Jones, David Henry
Primary Institution: The University of Newcastle
Hypothesis
How accurately and comprehensively does the Australian media report on health interventions?
Conclusion
Although the overall quality of medical reporting in the general media remains poor, this study showed modest improvements in some areas.
Supporting Evidence
- Broadsheet newspapers had the highest average satisfactory scores: 58%.
- Online news media showed a significant improvement of 5.1%.
- Statistically significant improvements were seen in coverage of potential harms and benefits.
Takeaway
This study looked at how well the media reports on health news in Australia and found that while there are some improvements, many stories still don't give the full picture.
Methodology
The study analyzed 1230 news stories rated on a national medical news monitoring website, comparing different media outlets and examining reporting trends over time.
Potential Biases
Potential bias exists due to the reliance on media releases and the lack of independent expert consultation in many stories.
Limitations
The study may not capture all relevant stories due to the search strategies used, and the methodology is still being refined.
Participant Demographics
The stories reviewed were from various Australian media outlets, covering a range of health interventions.
Statistical Information
P-Value
0.009
Confidence Interval
95% CI 1.32, 8.97
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website