Genetic Variation in Cryptosporidium parvum and Its Implications for Human Transmission
Author Information
Author(s): Michael M. Peng, Lihua Xiao, Amanda R. Freeman, Michael J. Arrowood, Ananias A. Escalante, Andre C. Weltman, Corinne S.L. Ong, William R. Mac Kenzie, Altaf A. Lal, Charles B. Beard
Primary Institution: The University of Michigan
Hypothesis
Are there distinct transmission cycles of Cryptosporidium parvum in humans based on genetic polymorphism?
Conclusion
The study identifies two distinct genotypes of Cryptosporidium parvum, suggesting different transmission cycles in humans.
Supporting Evidence
- All 39 isolates could be divided into two genotypes based on genetic polymorphism.
- Genotype 1 was observed only in human isolates, while genotype 2 was found in both human and calf isolates.
- Experimental infection studies showed that genotype 2 isolates were infective to mice and calves, unlike genotype 1 isolates.
Takeaway
Scientists studied a germ called Cryptosporidium that can make people sick, and they found two different types that spread in different ways.
Methodology
The study involved analyzing genetic polymorphism among 39 isolates of Cryptosporidium parvum from human and bovine sources.
Limitations
The study's findings are based on a limited number of isolates, and the representativeness of these samples for broader outbreaks is uncertain.
Participant Demographics
Isolates were obtained from humans and calves during outbreaks in the United States and Canada.
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website