Psychotherapy mediated by remote communication technologies: a meta-analytic review
2008

Remote Psychotherapy: A Review of Effectiveness

Sample size: 726 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Bee Penny E, Bower Peter, Lovell Karina, Gilbody Simon, Richards David, Gask Linda, Roach Pamela

Primary Institution: University of Manchester

Hypothesis

Can psychotherapy delivered via remote communication technologies be clinically effective?

Conclusion

Remote therapy can help overcome barriers to traditional psychotherapy, showing potential effectiveness, especially for anxiety-related disorders.

Supporting Evidence

  • Thirteen studies were included in the review, with varying methodologies.
  • Remote therapy showed a medium effect size for depression and a large effect for anxiety-related disorders.
  • Telephone-based interventions were the most common form of remote therapy assessed.

Takeaway

This study shows that talking to a therapist over the phone or internet can help people feel better, especially if they are anxious.

Methodology

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials assessing remote psychotherapy.

Potential Biases

Some studies had quasi-randomized allocation methods, which may introduce bias.

Limitations

The evidence is limited in quantity and quality, with many studies having methodological shortcomings.

Participant Demographics

Participants included individuals with depression, anxiety disorders, and other mental health issues, recruited from various settings.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.44 for depression, 1.15 for anxiety-related disorders

Confidence Interval

95% CI 0.29 to 0.59 for depression, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.49 for anxiety-related disorders

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-244X-8-60

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication