Local Implementation of Cancer Control Activities in Rural Appalachia, 2006
2009

Making Communities Healthier: Cancer Control in Rural Appalachia

Sample size: 24 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Behringer Bruce, Mabe Karen Harrell, Dorgan Kelly A., Hutson Sadie P.

Primary Institution: East Tennessee State University

Hypothesis

Underserved communities with high cancer rates often are not involved in implementing state cancer control activities locally.

Conclusion

The Appalachian Community Cancer Research Review Work Groups show that involving communities in cancer control can lead to better local implementation of state cancer plans.

Supporting Evidence

  • Participants learned to interpret cancer research findings from a community perspective.
  • Community leaders were engaged in discussions about cancer disparities.
  • Work group participants designed and implemented local cancer education activities.

Takeaway

This study shows that when communities work together to understand cancer, they can help each other and make better health choices.

Methodology

The study used community-based participatory research to form work groups that discussed cancer data and developed local education activities.

Potential Biases

The study may have biases due to the selection of community leaders rather than a random sample of the population.

Limitations

Some participants could not fully participate due to illness and work demands.

Participant Demographics

Participants included 14 from Tennessee and 10 from Virginia, aged 30 to 65, with diverse professional backgrounds and ethnicities.

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication