Variation in Annual Volume at a University Hospital Does Not Predict Mortality for Pancreatic Resections
2008

Pancreatic Resection Volume and Patient Outcomes

Sample size: 511 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Rita A. Mukhtar, Omar M. Kattan, Hobart W. Harris

Primary Institution: University of California, San Francisco

Hypothesis

Does variation in annual volume of pancreatic resections affect patient outcomes?

Conclusion

Annual volume of pancreatic resections does not predict postoperative mortality at a major academic medical center.

Supporting Evidence

  • No in-hospital deaths were recorded during low volume years.
  • Complication rates did not significantly differ between high and low volume years.
  • The only significant finding was fewer bile leaks in high volume years for pancreatic head resections.

Takeaway

This study found that how many pancreatic surgeries a hospital does each year doesn't really change how well patients do after surgery.

Methodology

Retrospective review of patient charts for 511 patients who underwent pancreatic resections, comparing outcomes based on annual volume.

Potential Biases

Potential inconsistencies in physician documentation of complications and inability to track post-discharge mortality.

Limitations

The study is retrospective and limited to a single hospital's experience, which may affect the generalizability of the results.

Participant Demographics

52% female, average age 58.6 years, 61% self-identified as White.

Statistical Information

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1155/2008/190914

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication