Method validation: the harmonization of collaborative analytical studies
1984
Harmonization of Collaborative Analytical Studies
publication
Author Information
Author(s): Harold Egan
Primary Institution: Laboratory of the Government Chemist
Hypothesis
The study aims to develop international guidelines for the validation of analytical methods through collaborative studies.
Conclusion
The symposium highlighted the need for harmonization in analytical method validation and the importance of understanding the reliability of analytical results.
Supporting Evidence
- The symposium was the first occasion for international organizations to compare their analytical methods.
- The need for criteria for the acceptance or validation of methods was emphasized.
- The AOAC is working on a definitive protocol for method validation.
Takeaway
This study is about making sure that different labs can trust each other's test results by agreeing on how to do the tests.
Methodology
The study involved discussions and reflections from an international symposium on analytical method validation.
Limitations
Total harmonization of methods is neither practicable nor necessarily desirable.
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website