ProsCan for Men: A Study on Decision Support for Prostate Cancer
Author Information
Author(s): Suzanne K Chambers, Megan Ferguson, RA Gardiner, David Nicol, Louisa Gordon, Stefano Occhipinti, Joanne Aitken
Primary Institution: Viertel Centre for Research in Cancer Control, Cancer Council Queensland
Hypothesis
Men who receive the intervention will have better psychosocial outcomes compared to those receiving usual care.
Conclusion
The study aims to improve decision-making and long-term adjustment for men with localized prostate cancer through a decision support intervention.
Supporting Evidence
- Prostate cancer is the most common male cancer in the Western world.
- Decision-related distress is common for men after diagnosis.
- Many men prefer active involvement in their treatment decisions.
Takeaway
This study is trying to help men with prostate cancer make better decisions about their treatment and feel better afterwards.
Methodology
700 men were recruited and randomized to receive either a decision support intervention or usual care, with assessments at multiple time points.
Limitations
The study may not generalize to all men with prostate cancer due to specific inclusion criteria.
Participant Demographics
Men newly diagnosed with localized prostate cancer, able to read and speak English, with no previous history of head injury, dementia, or psychiatric illness.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website