Noninvasive monitoring of myocardial function after surgical and cytostatic therapy in a peritoneal metastasis rat model: assessment with tissue Doppler and non-Doppler 2D strain echocardiography
2007

Monitoring Heart Function in Rats After Cancer Treatment

Sample size: 90 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Hartmann Jens, Knebel Fabian, Eddicks Stephan, Beling Mark, Grohmann Andrea, Panda Alexander, Jacobi Christoph A, Müller Joachim M, Wernecke Klaus-Dieter, Baumann Gert, Borges Adrian C

Primary Institution: Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany

Hypothesis

What is the impact of different antineoplastic treatment methods on myocardial function in rats?

Conclusion

Echocardiography can effectively assess heart function in rats undergoing various cancer treatments, revealing that overall treatment reduces myocardial deformation.

Supporting Evidence

  • Echocardiographic measurements were possible in all rats before and after treatment.
  • LVEDD and LVESD increased in all groups after treatment.
  • Circumferential strain of the inferior wall was significantly reduced after treatment.
  • Conventional echocardiographic parameters remained unaffected by the treatments.
  • All animals survived the study without significant complications.

Takeaway

Scientists studied how different cancer treatments affect the hearts of rats, finding that the treatments changed how the heart works, but not in a way that was specific to any one treatment.

Methodology

90 rats were divided into six groups to evaluate the effects of different cancer treatments on heart function using echocardiography.

Potential Biases

Potential biases may arise from the effects of anesthetic agents and the nature of the treatments on myocardial function.

Limitations

The study did not compare methods to a gold standard technique, and histological examinations were not performed.

Participant Demographics

90 male BDIX/HansHsd rats aged between 227 and 312 grams.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.001

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1476-7120-5-23

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication