Comparing Quality of Life After Two Surgical Treatments for Uterine Fibroids
Author Information
Author(s): Kim Hee Seung, Kim Jae Weon, Kim Mi-Kyung, Chung Hyun Hoon, Lee Taek Sang, Jeon Yong-Tark, Kim Yong Beom, Jeon Hye Won, Yun Young Ho, Park Noh Hyun, Song Yong Sang, Kang Soon-Beom
Primary Institution: Seoul National University College of Medicine
Hypothesis
Is there a difference in postoperative quality of life between laparoscopic uterine artery ligation and laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for treating symptomatic uterine fibroids?
Conclusion
The study aims to determine if laparoscopic uterine artery ligation can provide similar quality of life outcomes as laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy while preserving the uterus.
Supporting Evidence
- Laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy has advantages over abdominal hysterectomy.
- Laparoscopic uterine artery ligation can relieve symptoms while preserving the uterus.
- Quality of life will be measured using a validated questionnaire.
Takeaway
This study is looking at two ways to treat women with fibroids to see which one helps them feel better after surgery.
Methodology
This is a multi-center randomized controlled trial comparing postoperative quality of life between laparoscopic uterine artery ligation and laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
Potential Biases
Potential bias in patient selection and reporting of outcomes.
Limitations
The study may not account for all variables affecting quality of life post-surgery.
Participant Demographics
Women aged 40 and above with symptomatic uterine fibroids.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p<0.05
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website