Comparing Two Scoring Systems for Embryo Quality in IVF
Author Information
Author(s): Jana Brezinova, Ivana Oborna, Magda Svobodova, Helena Fingerova
Primary Institution: Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Palacky University of Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
Hypothesis
Which embryo scoring system better predicts implantation potential in IVF?
Conclusion
Early cleavage is a better independent marker of implantation potential than zygote morphology.
Supporting Evidence
- Early cleavage embryos showed significantly higher clinical pregnancy rates compared to non-early cleavage embryos.
- The best outcomes were achieved when both scoring systems were used together.
Takeaway
This study looked at two ways to score embryos to see which one helps doctors pick the best ones for pregnancy. It found that embryos that start dividing early are more likely to lead to a baby.
Methodology
The study assessed the quality of 2708 embryos from 364 IVF cycles using two scoring systems and analyzed the outcomes of embryo transfers.
Potential Biases
Potential bias in embryo selection and retrospective analysis.
Limitations
The study is retrospective and may be influenced by selection bias.
Participant Demographics
Women under the age of 39 years undergoing IVF.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p = 0.003 and p = 0.006
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website