Impact of Conflict on Infant Immunisation Coverage in Afghanistan
Author Information
Author(s): Mashal Taufiq, Nakamura Keiko, Kizuki Masashi, Seino Kaoruko, Takano Takehito
Primary Institution: Graduate School of Tokyo Medical and Dental University
Hypothesis
How does conflict and resource availability affect infant immunisation coverage in Afghanistan?
Conclusion
Despite progress in immunisation coverage, significant geographic inequalities remain, and security is a crucial factor in delivering immunisation services.
Supporting Evidence
- Immunisation coverage increased from 50.9% to 75.2% for BCG from 2000 to 2003.
- Districts reporting immunisation coverage rose from 67% in 2000 to 90% in 2003.
- Significant progress was observed in DPT3 coverage, increasing from 34.5% to 59.9%.
Takeaway
This study shows that even though more babies in Afghanistan are getting their vaccines, some areas are still struggling, especially where there is fighting.
Methodology
The study analyzed immunisation reports from 331 districts across 7 regions in Afghanistan using GIS analysis and multivariate logistic regression.
Potential Biases
Potential biases may arise from underreporting in conflict-affected areas.
Limitations
The study may not fully capture the impact of ongoing conflicts beyond the specified years.
Participant Demographics
The population of Afghanistan in 2002 was approximately 22 million, with over 80% living in rural areas.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p<0.001
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website