Ethical Issues in Implementation Research
Author Information
Author(s): Jane L. Hutton, Martin P. Eccles, Jeremy M. Grimshaw
Hypothesis
What are the ethical challenges related to obtaining informed consent in cluster randomized trials in implementation research?
Conclusion
The paper discusses the complexities of informed consent in implementation research and suggests that social science codes could inform ethical considerations.
Supporting Evidence
- Implementation research aims to improve the uptake of clinical findings into practice.
- Cluster randomized trials are preferred for evaluating implementation strategies.
- Ethical codes like the Nuremberg Code and Declaration of Helsinki may not fully apply to implementation research.
Takeaway
This study talks about how getting permission from patients for research can be tricky, especially when doctors are involved. It suggests that we might need to think differently about consent in these cases.
Methodology
The paper discusses ethical considerations and challenges in obtaining consent for cluster randomized trials in implementation research.
Potential Biases
Seeking consent may introduce bias or distress, affecting the outcomes of the research.
Limitations
The paper does not provide specific empirical data or case studies to support its arguments.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website