Rumors of Disease in the Global Village: Outbreak Verification
2000

Outbreak Verification: A New Approach to Global Disease Surveillance

Sample size: 246 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Thomas W. Grein, Kande-Bure O. Kamara, Guenael Rodier, Aileen J. Plant, Patrick Bovier, Michael J. Ryan, Takaaki Ohyama, David L. Heymann

Primary Institution: World Health Organization

Hypothesis

How can outbreak verification improve epidemic disease control?

Conclusion

Outbreak verification provides timely and accurate information about important disease outbreaks, enhancing epidemic preparedness and response.

Supporting Evidence

  • 246 outbreak reports of potential importance were identified and disseminated from July 1, 1997, to July 1, 1999.
  • 71% of initial reports were retrieved from informal or unofficial sources.
  • The median time between reported onset of an outbreak and the verification team's receipt of the first report was 18 days.
  • Timely dissemination of outbreak information is crucial for effective epidemic response.
  • 72% of Outbreak Verification List recipients found the list very useful or indispensable.

Takeaway

This study shows that checking and confirming disease outbreak reports helps keep people safe and informed about health risks.

Methodology

The study describes the processes of outbreak verification and information dissemination by the WHO.

Potential Biases

Information bias may arise from uneven access to technology and language representation in media.

Limitations

The selection process for outbreak reports may lack transparency and is subject to information bias due to reliance on media sources.

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication