Identifying Mouse Proteins Targeted to Peroxisomes
Author Information
Author(s): Mizuno Yumi, Kurochkin Igor V, Herberth Marlis, Okazaki Yasushi, Schönbach Christian
Primary Institution: Saitama Medical University
Hypothesis
Can computational methods accurately predict mouse peroxisome-targeted proteins and their subcellular locations?
Conclusion
The study found that none of the PTS2 candidates localized to peroxisomes, indicating that current prediction methods are inadequate.
Supporting Evidence
- The study modified an earlier PTS1 screening method to identify PTS2 candidates.
- A new cell line CHO-perRed was developed to confirm the localization of candidate proteins.
- Experimental results showed that none of the PTS2 candidates localized to peroxisomes.
Takeaway
The researchers tried to find mouse proteins that go to peroxisomes using computer programs, but they discovered that the predictions were wrong for many of them.
Methodology
The study used computational screening methods combined with manual annotation to identify potential peroxisome-targeted proteins.
Potential Biases
The reliance on computational predictions may introduce biases due to the limited dataset used for training.
Limitations
The predictions were based on limited training data and did not account for the complexity of protein localization.
Statistical Information
P-Value
0.04407
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website