Potential and Actual Terrestrial Rabies Exposures in People and Domestic Animals, Upstate South Carolina, 1994–2004: A Surveillance Study
2009

Rabies Exposures in South Carolina: A Study

Sample size: 22485 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Catherine W Roseveare, W David Goolsby, Ivo M Foppa

Primary Institution: Upstate Veterinary Specialists

Hypothesis

What are the potential and actual rabies exposures in people and domestic animals in Upstate South Carolina from 1994 to 2004?

Conclusion

Most rabies exposures come from rabid wildlife, despite the majority of reported incidents involving dogs and cats.

Supporting Evidence

  • Dogs and cats were responsible for the majority of reported rabies incidents.
  • Stray cats were more frequently reported rabid than stray dogs.
  • Almost 90% of confirmed rabies exposures were due to wildlife.

Takeaway

This study found that while many people and pets are reported to have rabies exposures, most of these cases actually come from wild animals like raccoons and skunks.

Methodology

Retrospective analysis of surveillance data of reported animal incidents from 1994 to 2004.

Potential Biases

Reporting mechanisms differ for human and animal victims, which may bias estimates of rabies risk.

Limitations

The study may underestimate the actual disease burden due to underreporting of animal incidents.

Participant Demographics

The study included incidents from seven northern counties of South Carolina.

Statistical Information

Confidence Interval

95% CI

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2458-9-65

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication