Chromosomal Aberrations and Cancer Risk
Author Information
Author(s): Rossi Anna Maria, Hansteen Inger-Lise, Skjelbred Camilla Furu, Ballardin Michela, Maggini Valentina, Murgia Elena, Tomei Antonio, Viarengo Paolo, Knudsen Lisbeth E., Barale Roberto, Norppa Hannu, Bonassi Stefano
Primary Institution: Department of Biology, Pisa University, Pisa, Italy
Hypothesis
Does the association between chromosomal aberrations and cancer risk depend on genetic polymorphisms in GSTM1 and GSTT1?
Conclusion
The study confirms that chromosomal aberration frequency is associated with cancer risk, but this association is not influenced by GSTM1 and GSTT1 genetic polymorphisms.
Supporting Evidence
- Chromosomal aberration frequency in lymphocytes is linked to increased cancer risk.
- The association between CA frequency and cancer risk was confirmed across different national cohorts.
- Genetic polymorphisms in GSTM1 and GSTT1 did not modify the association between CA and cancer risk.
- The study utilized a Bayesian model to analyze the data, which is beneficial for small sample sizes.
- Technical variability in cytogenetic analysis was minimized by using uniform protocols.
- CA frequency was particularly associated with cancers of the respiratory, genitourinary, and digestive tracts.
Takeaway
This study found that having more chromosomal damage in your blood can mean a higher chance of getting cancer, but it doesn't matter if you have certain genetic traits.
Methodology
A case-control study was conducted using data from cytogenetic studies, comparing 107 cancer cases with 291 controls, analyzing chromosomal aberrations and genetic polymorphisms.
Potential Biases
Different methods of DNA extraction and genotyping across laboratories may introduce variability.
Limitations
The study groups were small, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.
Participant Demographics
Participants included healthy individuals from Italy, Norway, and Denmark, with a mix of genders and smoking statuses.
Statistical Information
P-Value
0.006
Confidence Interval
95% CrI, 0.9–2.5 for medium CA; 95% CrI, 1.6–4.6 for high CA
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website