Association between Frequency of Chromosomal Aberrations and Cancer Risk Is Not Influenced by Genetic Polymorphisms in GSTM1 and GSTT1
2009

Chromosomal Aberrations and Cancer Risk

Sample size: 398 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Rossi Anna Maria, Hansteen Inger-Lise, Skjelbred Camilla Furu, Ballardin Michela, Maggini Valentina, Murgia Elena, Tomei Antonio, Viarengo Paolo, Knudsen Lisbeth E., Barale Roberto, Norppa Hannu, Bonassi Stefano

Primary Institution: Department of Biology, Pisa University, Pisa, Italy

Hypothesis

Does the association between chromosomal aberrations and cancer risk depend on genetic polymorphisms in GSTM1 and GSTT1?

Conclusion

The study confirms that chromosomal aberration frequency is associated with cancer risk, but this association is not influenced by GSTM1 and GSTT1 genetic polymorphisms.

Supporting Evidence

  • Chromosomal aberration frequency in lymphocytes is linked to increased cancer risk.
  • The association between CA frequency and cancer risk was confirmed across different national cohorts.
  • Genetic polymorphisms in GSTM1 and GSTT1 did not modify the association between CA and cancer risk.
  • The study utilized a Bayesian model to analyze the data, which is beneficial for small sample sizes.
  • Technical variability in cytogenetic analysis was minimized by using uniform protocols.
  • CA frequency was particularly associated with cancers of the respiratory, genitourinary, and digestive tracts.

Takeaway

This study found that having more chromosomal damage in your blood can mean a higher chance of getting cancer, but it doesn't matter if you have certain genetic traits.

Methodology

A case-control study was conducted using data from cytogenetic studies, comparing 107 cancer cases with 291 controls, analyzing chromosomal aberrations and genetic polymorphisms.

Potential Biases

Different methods of DNA extraction and genotyping across laboratories may introduce variability.

Limitations

The study groups were small, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.

Participant Demographics

Participants included healthy individuals from Italy, Norway, and Denmark, with a mix of genders and smoking statuses.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.006

Confidence Interval

95% CrI, 0.9–2.5 for medium CA; 95% CrI, 1.6–4.6 for high CA

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1289/ehp.11769

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication