The effect of a pedometer-based community walking intervention 'Walking for Wellbeing in the West' on physical activity levels and health outcomes: a 12-week randomized controlled trial
2008

Walking for Wellbeing in the West: A Pedometer-Based Walking Program

Sample size: 79 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Graham Baker, Stuart R. Gray, Annemarie Wright, Claire Fitzsimons, Myra Nimmo, Ruth Lowry, Nannette Mutrie

Primary Institution: Scottish Physical Activity Research Collaboration (SPARColl)

Hypothesis

Does a 12-week pedometer-based walking intervention increase physical activity levels and improve health outcomes in a community sample?

Conclusion

The pedometer-based walking program effectively increased walking and positive affect in participants over 12 weeks, but did not significantly change other health outcomes.

Supporting Evidence

  • Participants in the intervention group increased their daily step counts significantly.
  • 64% of the intervention group achieved the goal of 15,000 steps per week.
  • The intervention group reported a significant increase in positive affect.
  • Significant decreases in sitting time were observed in the intervention group.
  • No significant changes in health outcomes other than positive affect were found.

Takeaway

This study shows that using a pedometer to encourage walking can make people happier and help them walk more, but it didn't change their health in other ways.

Methodology

Participants were randomly assigned to an intervention or control group, with the intervention group receiving a pedometer and physical activity consultation over 12 weeks.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to self-reporting of physical activity and health outcomes.

Limitations

The study did not control for dietary factors and relied on self-reported measures for some outcomes, which may introduce bias.

Participant Demographics

63 women and 16 men, average age 49.2 years.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p < .001

Confidence Interval

2,115 – 4,236

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1479-5868-5-44

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication