Occupational Exposure to Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Risk of Breast Cancer
2009

PCB Exposure and Breast Cancer Risk

Sample size: 5752 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Sharon R. Silver, Elizabeth A. Whelan, James A. Deddens, N. Kyle Steenland, Nancy B. Hopf, Martha A. Waters, Avima M. Ruder, Mary M. Prince, Lee C. Yong, Misty J. Hein, Elizabeth M. Ward

Primary Institution: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

Hypothesis

Is there a relationship between occupational exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and the risk of breast cancer?

Conclusion

The study found no overall increase in breast cancer risk from PCB exposure, but there were significant associations among nonwhite workers that require further investigation.

Supporting Evidence

  • The breast cancer standardized incidence ratio (SIR) was 0.81, indicating no overall elevation in risk.
  • Positive associations with PCB exposure were found among nonwhite workers, suggesting a need for further research.
  • Statistical analyses showed that traditional risk factors accounted for little of the increased risk among nonwhite workers.

Takeaway

This study looked at women who worked with PCBs and found that while most didn't have a higher risk of breast cancer, some nonwhite workers did, which needs more study.

Methodology

The study followed 5,752 women employed in capacitor manufacturing, collecting data through questionnaires and cancer registries to assess breast cancer incidence.

Potential Biases

Response bias may have occurred if nonrespondents had lower breast cancer rates, potentially skewing results.

Limitations

The study may have missed some breast cancer cases, especially in earlier years, and relied on self-reported data which could introduce bias.

Participant Demographics

The cohort consisted of women employed in capacitor manufacturing, with a focus on race and exposure levels.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.81

Confidence Interval

95% CI, 0.72–0.92

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1289/ehp.11774

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication