Provincial prenatal record revision: a multiple case study of evidence-based decision-making at the population-policy level
2008

Improving Prenatal Records in Canada

Sample size: 12 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Nancy Edwards, Sonia Semenic, Shahirose Premji, Phyllis Montgomery, Beverly Williams, Joanne Olson, Omaima Mansi

Primary Institution: University of Ottawa

Hypothesis

How do contextual factors influence the decision-making process for revising provincial prenatal records in Canada?

Conclusion

The study will enhance understanding of how contextual factors affect health policy decisions regarding prenatal records.

Supporting Evidence

  • The study aims to identify how research evidence is integrated into health policy decisions.
  • It will compare decision-making processes across different provinces.
  • The research focuses on maternal smoking and alcohol use as key factors in prenatal care.

Takeaway

This study looks at how different factors affect the way provinces in Canada update their prenatal records to include important health information.

Methodology

A multiple case study design with embedded units of analysis will be used, involving interviews, surveys, and document reviews across six Canadian provinces.

Limitations

The study may be limited by the variability in how different provinces implement and update their prenatal records.

Participant Demographics

Key informants will include members of provincial prenatal record revision committees, clinical experts, and policymakers.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1472-6963-8-266

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication