Guideline Implementation for Type 2 Diabetes Treatment
Author Information
Author(s): Perria Carla, Mandolini Donatella, Guerrera Carmelina, Jefferson Tom, Billi Paolo, Calzini Virgilio, Fiorillo Alfonso, Grasso Giuseppe, Leotta Sergio, Marrocco Walter, Suraci Concetta, Pasquarella Amina
Primary Institution: Community Health Unit, Lazio Region Public Health Agency, Rome, Italy
Hypothesis
A structured intervention would be no more effective than a passive dissemination of the guideline or of a no-intervention strategy.
Conclusion
Compliance of GPs with guidelines was not enhanced by a structured learning programme.
Supporting Evidence
- The active implementation strategy was ineffective relating to all primary outcomes.
- Passive dissemination of the guideline showed no effect.
- The study involved 252 GPs from the Lazio region.
Takeaway
The study tried to help doctors follow diabetes treatment guidelines better, but it didn't work.
Methodology
Three-arm cluster-randomised controlled trial with GPs as units of randomisation.
Potential Biases
Possible contamination with participants belonging to different arms.
Limitations
Uncertain representativeness of enrolled GPs compared to the remaining GPs which could affect external validity of results.
Participant Demographics
Mean age of GPs was 50 years, with 85% being male.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p<0.05
Confidence Interval
[95% IC: 0.76–1.46]
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website