Immunodominance of HIV-1 Specific CD8+ T-Cell Responses Is Related to Disease Progression Rate in Vertically Infected Adolescents
2011

HIV-1 CD8+ T-Cell Responses and Disease Progression in Infected Adolescents

Sample size: 58 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Elizabeth R. Sharp, Christian B. Willberg, Peter J. Kuebler, Jacob Abadi, Glenn J. Fennelly, Joanna Dobroszycki, Andew A. Wiznia, Michael G. Rosenberg, Douglas F. Nixon

Primary Institution: University of California San Francisco

Hypothesis

Differences in the pattern of immunodomination of HIV-1 specific CD8+ T cell responses could partially explain differences in disease progression rate.

Conclusion

The region of HIV-1-Gag targeted by CD8+ T cells may be more important to the rate of disease progression than the qualitative features of these T cells.

Supporting Evidence

  • Subjects with no immune suppression had a higher frequency of naïve CD8+ T cells compared to those with severe immune suppression.
  • Responses to specific Gag peptides were more frequent in subjects with better disease outcomes.
  • Immunodominant responses were primarily restricted by HLA-B*57 and B*42 alleles.

Takeaway

This study looked at how the immune response to HIV in teenagers affects how quickly the disease gets worse. It found that which part of the virus the immune system targets is really important.

Methodology

The study mapped and quantified CD8+ T cell responses against HIV-1 Gag peptides in 58 vertically infected adolescents, categorizing them based on their CD4% levels.

Potential Biases

The study's findings may be influenced by the heterogeneous treatment adherence levels among subjects.

Limitations

The small sample size limits the generalizability of the findings, and the subjects were not all receiving the same treatment regimen.

Participant Demographics

Participants were adolescents with vertically acquired HIV-1, with a mean age of 14.3 years, including a mix of African American and Hispanic individuals.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.0066

Confidence Interval

(27.1; 34.8)

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0021135

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication