SHIFTING OF COGNITIVE ASSESSMENTS BETWEEN FACE-TO-FACE AND TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION: MEASUREMENT CONSIDERATION
2024

Cognitive Assessments: Phone vs. In-Person

Sample size: 6825 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Jason Smith

Primary Institution: Johns Hopkins University

Hypothesis

Does the method of cognitive assessment (telephone vs. in-person) affect cognitive performance in older adults?

Conclusion

Cognitive assessments show significant differences based on whether they are conducted via telephone or in-person, particularly in memory and attention tests.

Supporting Evidence

  • People assessed by telephone had higher scores for memory and calculation items.
  • Non-memory items scored lower when assessed by telephone.
  • Cognition was differentially related to IADL score depending on assessment mode.
  • Measurement invariance testing showed the largest mode differences in memory and attention items.

Takeaway

When older people take memory tests over the phone, they often score higher than when they take the same tests in person.

Methodology

We evaluated mode effects on cognitive items and overall scores in older adults using data from the 2014 Health and Retirement Study.

Limitations

The study may not account for all variables affecting cognitive performance across different assessment modes.

Participant Demographics

Adults aged 65-79.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1093/geroni/igae098.1349

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication