Comparing Ultrasound Scanners for Preclinical Imaging
Author Information
Author(s): Moran Carmel, Pye Stephen D., Ellis William, Janeczko Anna, Morris Keith D., McNeilly Alan S., Fraser Hamish M.
Primary Institution: University of Edinburgh
Hypothesis
The study aims to assess the imaging performance of various ultrasound scanners for preclinical applications.
Conclusion
The study found that the Vevo 770 and Vevo 2100 scanners performed best for preclinical imaging based on resolution integral measurements.
Supporting Evidence
- The Vevo 770 RMV 704 transducer showed greater detail in ovarian structures compared to other scanners.
- The Diasus scanner had a 100% effective determination of pregnancy in marmosets.
- The study utilized the Edinburgh Pipe Phantom to quantitatively assess ultrasound scanners.
Takeaway
This study looked at different ultrasound machines to see which one takes the best pictures of small animals, like marmosets, to help scientists learn more about them.
Methodology
The study used both quantitative analysis with Edinburgh Pipe Phantoms and qualitative in vivo assessments on common marmosets.
Limitations
The in vivo results were predominantly qualitative, and the study was limited to specific ultrasound transducers.
Participant Demographics
59 adult female common marmosets were scanned.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website