Brain Correlates of Non-Symbolic Numerosity Estimation in Low and High Mathematical Ability Children
2009

Brain Correlates of Non-Symbolic Numerosity Estimation in Children

Sample size: 26 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Kovas Yulia, Giampietro Vincent, Viding Essi, Ng Virginia, Brammer Michael, Barker Gareth J., Happé Francesca G. E., Plomin Robert

Primary Institution: Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London

Hypothesis

Are individual differences in mathematical ability associated with differential brain correlates during non-symbolic numerosity estimation in children?

Conclusion

The study found that different brain activation patterns were observed in children with low and high mathematical ability during non-symbolic numerosity estimation, despite similar behavioral performance.

Supporting Evidence

  • Children with high mathematical ability showed different brain activation patterns compared to those with low ability during numerosity tasks.
  • Both groups performed similarly in terms of accuracy and reaction time on the tasks.
  • Brain areas involved in numerosity estimation were widely distributed and included regions not typically associated with numerical processing.

Takeaway

This study looked at how children's brains work when they estimate numbers without using symbols, and found that kids who are better at math use their brains differently than those who struggle.

Methodology

The study used fMRI to examine brain activity in 10-year-old children during non-symbolic numerosity estimation tasks.

Potential Biases

Potential biases in participant selection based on mathematical ability could affect the generalizability of the findings.

Limitations

The sample size was relatively small and may not represent the broader population of children.

Participant Demographics

Participants were 10-year-old children, including 17 boys and 9 girls.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.05

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0004587

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication