Comparing Virtual Slide Web Viewers for Pathologists
Author Information
Author(s): Marcial García Rojo, Antonio J Gallardo, Lucía González, Carlos Peces, Cristina Murillo, Jesús González, Jose Sacristán
Primary Institution: Hospital General de Ciudad Real
Hypothesis
What is the subjective experience of pathologists using different virtual slide web viewers?
Conclusion
Different web solutions for virtual slides have unique advantages, particularly in their functionalities and optimization for various magnifications.
Supporting Evidence
- Aperio viewer is efficient for overview images.
- Aurora viewer excels in lower magnifications.
- Olympus viewer is the most user-friendly interface.
- No significant differences were found for larger magnifications between vendors.
Takeaway
This study looked at how pathologists feel about using different online tools to view slides, finding that some tools are better for certain tasks.
Methodology
Five pathologists accessed eight virtual slides using three different web viewers and timed their experiences.
Limitations
The study did not control for available network bandwidth or client-side factors like PC performance.
Participant Demographics
Five pathologists from Hospital General de Ciudad Real.
Statistical Information
P-Value
0.05
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website