Cost-effectiveness of a Fast Track Rehabilitation Service for Multi-Trauma Patients
Author Information
Author(s): Kosar Sevginur, Seelen Henk AM, Hemmen Bena, Evers Silvia MAA, Brink Peter RG
Primary Institution: Rehabilitation Foundation Limburg, Hoensbroek, The Netherlands
Hypothesis
The Supported Fast Track multi-Trauma Rehabilitation Service (SFTRS) is more (cost-) effective than the Conventional multi-Trauma Care Service (CTCS).
Conclusion
The study aims to determine if the SFTRS leads to better outcomes and lower costs compared to the conventional care service.
Supporting Evidence
- An integrated rehabilitation approach may lead to better outcomes for multi-trauma patients.
- Early rehabilitation involvement is expected to reduce hospital stays and improve recovery.
- Cost savings are anticipated due to reduced lengths of stay in hospitals and rehabilitation clinics.
Takeaway
This study is looking at whether a new way to help people with serious injuries can save money and help them get better faster.
Methodology
A prospective, multi-centre, non-randomised clinical trial comparing two rehabilitation services over a 12-month follow-up period.
Potential Biases
Potential bias due to non-randomised design and geographical distances between treatment centers.
Limitations
The study is non-randomised due to practical and ethical reasons, which may introduce bias.
Participant Demographics
Multi-trauma patients aged 18 and older with severe injuries, primarily male and younger adults.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website