Oral mucosal lesions in skin diseased patients attending a dermatologic clinic: a cross-sectional study in Sudan
2011

Oral Mucosal Lesions in Patients with Skin Diseases in Sudan

Sample size: 544 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Suliman Nada M, Åstrøm Anne N, Ali Raouf W, Salman Hussein, Johannessen Anne C

Primary Institution: The Gade Institute, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

Hypothesis

This study aimed to estimate the frequency and socio-behavioural correlates of oral mucosal lesions (OML) in skin diseased patients attending a dermatology clinic.

Conclusion

Oral mucosal lesions were frequently diagnosed in skin diseased patients and varied systematically with age, gender, systemic condition, and use of toombak.

Supporting Evidence

  • 57.9% of skin diseased patients had at least one type of oral mucosal lesion.
  • Tongue lesions were the most frequently diagnosed oral mucosal lesions at 23.3%.
  • OML were more common in older patients (62.4%) compared to younger patients (52.7%).
  • OML were more frequent in males (63.2%) than females (52.6%).
  • Patients with systemic conditions had a higher prevalence of OML (65.2%).
  • Current users of toombak had a significantly higher prevalence of OML (77.9%).

Takeaway

Doctors found that many patients with skin problems also had issues in their mouths, and these problems were more common in older people and men.

Methodology

A cross-sectional hospital-based study was conducted with 544 patients who completed an oral examination and personal interview.

Potential Biases

Self-selection bias may have influenced the results, as patients with oral lesions were more likely to participate.

Limitations

The study's findings may not be generalizable due to the hospital-based nature and potential biases in patient selection.

Participant Demographics

The mean age was 37.1 years, with 50% females and 77% permanent residents of Khartoum.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.05

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1472-6831-11-24

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication