Mega-phylogeny approach for comparative biology: an alternative to supertree and supermatrix approaches
2009

Mega-phylogeny Approach for Comparative Biology

Sample size: 13433 publication Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Stephen A. Smith, Jeremy M. Beaulieu, Michael J. Donoghue

Primary Institution: National Evolutionary Synthesis Center

Hypothesis

Can a modified supermatrix method termed mega-phylogeny effectively construct large phylogenetic trees?

Conclusion

The mega-phylogeny method allows for the construction of large phylogenetic trees that reveal previously unseen evolutionary patterns.

Supporting Evidence

  • The mega-phylogeny method produced a phylogeny for Asterales with 4954 species and 12,033 sites.
  • The method successfully reconstructed major relationships of vascular plants using the rbcL gene for 13,533 species.
  • Patterns of molecular evolution were revealed that were previously unseen due to the size of the phylogenies constructed.

Takeaway

This study shows a new way to build big family trees for plants using lots of data, helping us see how different plants are related.

Methodology

The mega-phylogeny method combines databased sequences and taxonomic hierarchies to create large phylogenetic trees with denser matrices.

Potential Biases

Potential issues with misidentification in databases and rogue taxa affecting tree resolution.

Limitations

The method relies on prior knowledge of phylogenetic relationships, which may introduce bias if assumptions about monophyly are incorrect.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2148-9-37

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication