Feasibility and costs of water fluoridation in remote Australian Aboriginal communities
2007

Water Fluoridation in Remote Aboriginal Communities

publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Ehsani Jonathon P, Bailie Ross

Primary Institution: Menzies School of Health Research and Institute of Advanced Studies, Charles Darwin University

Hypothesis

Can water fluoridation be effectively implemented in remote Indigenous communities in Australia?

Conclusion

The study highlights the need for effective management systems and reliable equipment suppliers for successful water fluoridation in remote communities.

Supporting Evidence

  • Fluoridation can reduce dental caries by 20-40%.
  • Many remote Indigenous communities lack access to fluoridated water.
  • Operational issues were identified that affected the effectiveness of the fluoridation plants.

Takeaway

This study looked at adding fluoride to water in remote Aboriginal communities to help prevent tooth decay. It found that while it can work, there are many challenges to make it happen.

Methodology

The study involved installing small-scale fluoridation plants in two remote communities and monitoring their operation over two years.

Limitations

The study faced issues with faulty equipment and incomplete data collection, which limited the ability to assess fluoride levels accurately.

Participant Demographics

The study focused on two remote Indigenous communities in the Northern Territory of Australia, with populations of approximately 2,000 and 1,300.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2458-7-100

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication