Study on Spasticity Measurement After Stroke
Author Information
Author(s): Alibiglou Laila, Rymer William Z, Harvey Richard L, Mirbagheri Mehdi M
Primary Institution: Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
Hypothesis
Are quantitative measures of spasticity valid and correlated with the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)?
Conclusion
The study found no significant correlation between quantitative measures of spasticity and the MAS, suggesting the MAS may not reliably reflect the underlying neuromuscular components of spasticity.
Supporting Evidence
- The study used a cohort of 34 stroke survivors to assess spasticity.
- Quantitative measures of spasticity were found to be uncorrelated with the MAS scores.
- The MAS was shown to not reliably reflect the neuromuscular components of spasticity.
Takeaway
The study looked at how well a common test for spasticity matches with more precise measurements, and it found that the test might not be very accurate.
Methodology
The study involved measuring joint stiffness in stroke survivors using small joint stretches and advanced system identification techniques.
Limitations
The study's findings may not apply to all types of spasticity or to different populations outside of stroke survivors.
Participant Demographics
34 stroke survivors, average age approximately 58 years.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p<0.0001
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website