Evidence-based effect size estimation: An illustration using the case of acupuncture for cancer-related fatigue
2009

Estimating Effect Size for Acupuncture in Cancer-Related Fatigue

Sample size: 101 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Michael F Johnston, Ron D Hays, Ka-Kit Hui

Primary Institution: University of California, Los Ángeles

Hypothesis

Can evidence-based effect size estimation improve sample size calculations for acupuncture studies in cancer-related fatigue?

Conclusion

Evidence-based effect size estimation helps justify assumptions in light of empirical evidence and can lead to more realistic sample size calculations.

Supporting Evidence

  • The study suggests that an adequately-powered phase III trial would require at least 101 subjects if a strong effect is assumed.
  • Evidence-based effect size estimation can lead to more realistic sample size calculations.
  • The study highlights the importance of justifying effect size assumptions in clinical trials.

Takeaway

This study shows how researchers can use existing data to better estimate how many people they need for a study on acupuncture helping tired cancer patients.

Methodology

The study used a systematic literature search to derive effect size estimates from existing studies on acupuncture and fatigue.

Potential Biases

Potential biases may arise from the differences in study designs and populations used in the literature.

Limitations

The study relies on existing literature, which may have variability in results and populations.

Participant Demographics

The studies included breast cancer survivors and other patient populations experiencing fatigue.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.003

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1472-6882-9-1

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication